http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Family_pensions%3A_IndiaFamily pensions: India - Revision history2026-05-31T23:07:43ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.19.2http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?title=Family_pensions:_India&diff=132569&oldid=prevJyoti at 20:53, 1 August 20242024-08-01T20:53:26Z<p></p>
<table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'>
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<col class='diff-marker' />
<col class='diff-content' />
<tr valign='top'>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td>
<td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 20:53, 1 August 2024</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 6:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 6:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>|}</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>|}</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category:India |F ]]</del></div></td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category:Government |F ]]</del></div></td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><del style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary |F ]]</del></div></td><td colspan="2"> </td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="background: #ffa; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>=Divorced daughter not entitled to pension: HC=</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">=Adopted children=</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">==Children adopted after retirement==</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">[https://epaper.indiatimes.com/article-share?article=17_06_2024_008_010_cap_TOI  Ajay Sura, June 17, 2024: ''The Times of India'']</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Chandigarh: Punjab and Haryana high court has made it clear that there cannot be any discrimination in granting family pension to legally adopted children merely on account of the date of their adoption, reports Ajay Sura.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline"> The court was of the view that children adopted post-retirement cannot be deprived of pensionary benefits. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya passed the order while allowing a petition filed by Vikas Kumar, resident of Haryana’s Jhajjar district.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline"> He had sought quashing of a Haryana govt order dated Feb 14, 2019, that rejected his claim for family pension. He had also sought directions to release family pension, effective from Sept 24, 2012, with interest, till attaining 25 years of age.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline"> The petitioner’s father had retired from military service on July 4, 1970, and was released on military pension. Thereafter, he joined Haryana govt on the post of ‘barkandaz’ (guard) on Sept 27, 1971, and was promoted to the rank of ‘daffedar.’ After his superannuation on July 31, 1987, he adopted the petitioner as son on March 1, 2000, but passed away on Jan 26, 2011. The petitioner claimed family pension from the department, but was not granted it. No reason was cited for it.</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div> </div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">=Divorced children=</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">=</ins>=Divorced daughter not entitled to pension: HC<ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">=</ins>=</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Divorced-daughter-of-freedom-fighter-not-entitled-to-pension-HC/articleshow/49795487.cms ''The Times of India''], November 16, 2015</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Divorced-daughter-of-freedom-fighter-not-entitled-to-pension-HC/articleshow/49795487.cms ''The Times of India''], November 16, 2015</div></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 18:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 31:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>The Punjab and Haryana HC has held that the divorced unemployed daughter of a freedom fighter would not be entitled to family pension after her parents' death. It said “a divorced woman has an alternative means of sustenance for her life by way of claiming maintenance from ex-husband and is, thus, not exclusively dependent upon the amount of pension of her father as a freedom fighter“.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>The Punjab and Haryana HC has held that the divorced unemployed daughter of a freedom fighter would not be entitled to family pension after her parents' death. It said “a divorced woman has an alternative means of sustenance for her life by way of claiming maintenance from ex-husband and is, thus, not exclusively dependent upon the amount of pension of her father as a freedom fighter“.</div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;"></ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category:Government|F </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">FAMILY PENSIONS: INDIA]]</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category:India|F </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">FAMILY PENSIONS: INDIA]]</ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">[[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary|F </ins></div></td></tr>
<tr><td colspan="2"> </td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">FAMILY PENSIONS: INDIA]]</ins></div></td></tr>
</table>Jyotihttp://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?title=Family_pensions:_India&diff=54207&oldid=prevPdewan: Created page with "{| Class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/> </div> |} [[Category:Ind..."2015-12-03T12:57:42Z<p>Created page with "{| Class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/> </div> |} [[Category:Ind..."</p>
<p><b>New page</b></p><div>{| Class="wikitable"<br />
|-<br />
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"><br />
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/><br />
</div><br />
|}<br />
<br />
[[Category:India |F ]]<br />
[[Category:Government |F ]]<br />
[[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary |F ]]<br />
<br />
=Divorced daughter not entitled to pension: HC=<br />
[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Divorced-daughter-of-freedom-fighter-not-entitled-to-pension-HC/articleshow/49795487.cms ''The Times of India''], November 16, 2015<br />
<br />
Ajay Sura<br />
<br />
'''Divorced daughter of freedom fighter not entitled to pension: HC'''<br />
<br />
The Punjab and Haryana HC has held that the divorced unemployed daughter of a freedom fighter would not be entitled to family pension after her parents' death. It said “a divorced woman has an alternative means of sustenance for her life by way of claiming maintenance from ex-husband and is, thus, not exclusively dependent upon the amount of pension of her father as a freedom fighter“.</div>Pdewan