High Courts: India - Revision history

Jyoti at 04:51, 10 March 2023

2023-03-10T04:51:44Z

Pdewan: /* 2015: vacancies in HCs, pendency of cases */

2023-02-25T19:27:14Z

‎2015: vacancies in HCs, pendency of cases

Pdewan at 11:00, 22 January 2016

2016-01-22T11:00:38Z

Pdewan at 13:11, 19 November 2014

2014-11-19T13:11:37Z

Pdewan: Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.

|} [[Category:Ind..."

2014-11-19T12:41:02Z

Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/> </div> |} [[Category:Ind..."

New page

{| class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/>
</div>
|}

[[Category:India |H]]
[[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary|H]]
[[File: Supreme Court Reject Trials .jpg| |frame|500px]]

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 |}
-[[Category:India |H]]
-[[Category:Law-Constitution-Judiciary|H]]
 [[File: Supreme Court Reject Trials .jpg|Indian High Courts: Vacancies of Judges; pendency of cases  |frame|500px]]
 =Vacancies in HCs, pendency of cases=
 ==2015==
@@ Line 32: / Line 51: @@
 HIGH COURTS: INDIA]]
 [[Category:Law-Constitution-Judiciary|H
 HIGH COURTS: INDIA]]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 [[Category:Law-Constitution-Judiciary|H]]
 [[File: Supreme Court Reject Trials .jpg|Indian High Courts: Vacancies of Judges; pendency of cases  |frame|500px]]
-=2015: vacancies in HCs, pendency of cases=
+=Vacancies in HCs, pendency of cases=
 [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=43-of-HC-posts-vacant-backlog-may-hit-07012016012015 ''The Times of India''] Jan 07 2016
@@ Line 27: / Line 28: @@
 Over 40% of positions of Justices of high courts remaining vacant is simply not acceptable. One of the most fundamental duties of a state to its citizens is the delivery of justice. A situation in which justice is often too delayed to be meaningful cannot be allowed to continue. TOI has consistently campaigned for vacancies to be filled and pending cases to be urgently tackled. The stand-off between the judiciary and the executive on how judges are to be appointed has clearly not helped, but the vacancies must be filled, the sooner the better.