Narsingh Pancham Yadav - Revision history

Jyoti: /* 2016 */

2016-09-09T19:28:42Z

‎2016

Pdewan: /* Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival */

2016-08-22T08:47:26Z

‎Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival

Pdewan: /* Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival */

2016-08-19T08:12:55Z

‎Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival

Pdewan: /* Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival */

2016-08-18T22:56:42Z

‎Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival

Pdewan: /* Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival */

2016-08-02T19:36:09Z

‎Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival

Pdewan: /* 2016 */

2016-08-02T16:12:52Z

‎2016

Pdewan: /* Doping */

2016-08-02T16:06:19Z

‎Doping

Pdewan: /* Doping */

2016-07-24T22:38:16Z

‎Doping

Pdewan: /* 2016 */

2016-07-24T22:37:29Z

‎2016

Pdewan: /* Doping */

2016-07-24T22:36:54Z

‎Doping

@@ Line 40: / Line 40: @@
 However, in his bronze medal play-off, he got his act together to outplay Zelimkhan Khadjiev of France 12-8 to make it to the podium. Arun, meanwhile, did well to beat Tat Du Can of Vietnam 7-0 and Semen Radulov of Ukraine 5-4 to advance to the quarterfinal round. But he lost to local wrestler James Malcolm Green 0-10 in the last-eight stage.
 =2016=
 Narsingh, who won the 74kg Olympic quota berth with a World Championships bronze medal last year, was selected for Rio in controversial circumstances after double Olympic-medallist Sushil Kumar's demands for a trial were rejected both by the WFI and the Delhi high court.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:47, 22 August 2016
Line 72:		Line 72:

	In '''August 2016''' Narsingh was ousted from the Olympics and slapped with a four year ban+ for flunking a dope test after the ad hoc division of Court of Arbitration for Sports overturned the clean chit given to him by the National Anti-Doping Agency.		In '''August 2016''' Narsingh was ousted from the Olympics and slapped with a four year ban+ for flunking a dope test after the ad hoc division of Court of Arbitration for Sports overturned the clean chit given to him by the National Anti-Doping Agency.
		+	==‘Narsingh intentionally took substance in tablet form:’ CAS ==
		+	[http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/sports/rio-2016-olympics/india-in-olympics-2016/wrestling/CAS-rules-Narsingh-intentionally-took-substance-in-tablet-form/articleshow/53803607.cms PTI \| Aug 22, 2016]
		+
		+	NEW DELHI: While handing down a four-year ban on Narsingh Yadav+ , the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) has ruled that the wrestler failed to produce any "real evidence" regarding the sabotage theory+ he had advanced and the balance of probabilities" was that he orally took the banned substance intentionally in tablet form on more than one occasion.
		+
		+	In its full award, the ad hoc panel of the CAS relied on expert evidence that Narsingh's dope offence was not due to one-time ingestion of the prohibited substance and its concentration in the first test result (of June 25) was so high that it had to come from an oral ingestion of one or two tablets of methandienone, rather than from a drink where the powder had been mixed with water.
		+
		+	The expert opinion was given by Professor Christiane Ayotte from Canada who was presented by the World Anti-Doping Agency. Professor Ayotte is a member of IAAF Doping Commission since 1995 and was elected representative of the Heads of IOC Accredited Laboratories in 1995-1996. She is currently the Director of the WADA-accredited laboratory in Montreal.
		+
		+	Narsingh's urine sample taken out-of competition on June 25 was found to contain metabolites of methandienone and long term metabolite of methandienone. Another sample taken out-of competition on July 5 was also found to contain long term metabolites of methandienone.
		+
		+	"...all in all found the sabotage (s) theory possible, but not probable and certainly not grounded in any real evidence. The panel therefore determined that the athlete had failed to satisfy his burden of proof and the panel was satisfied that the most likely explanation was that the athlete simply and intentionally ingested the prohibited substance in tablet form on more than one occasion," the CAS panel said.
		+
		+	The CAS had handed Narsingh a four-year ban in its 'operative award' on August 18 barely hours before his 74kg freestyle opening bout was scheduled.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:12, 19 August 2016
Line 70:		Line 70:

	However, to Narsingh’s dismay, the WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) challenged the Indian NADA's decision and moved the CAS amid speculation that the wrestler may face a ban up to four years.		However, to Narsingh’s dismay, the WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) challenged the Indian NADA's decision and moved the CAS amid speculation that the wrestler may face a ban up to four years.
		+
		+	In '''August 2016''' Narsingh was ousted from the Olympics and slapped with a four year ban+ for flunking a dope test after the ad hoc division of Court of Arbitration for Sports overturned the clean chit given to him by the National Anti-Doping Agency.

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:56, 18 August 2016
Line 68:		Line 68:

	Narsingh had approached the Haryana police with a complaint against the 17-year-old Delhi wrestler last week after which a case was registered at the Rai police station under sections 328 (causing hurt by means of poison with an intent to commit an offence) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.		Narsingh had approached the Haryana police with a complaint against the 17-year-old Delhi wrestler last week after which a case was registered at the Rai police station under sections 328 (causing hurt by means of poison with an intent to commit an offence) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.
		+
		+	However, to Narsingh’s dismay, the WADA (World Anti-Doping Agency) challenged the Indian NADA's decision and moved the CAS amid speculation that the wrestler may face a ban up to four years.

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:36, 2 August 2016
Line 64:		Line 64:

	The wrestler's lawyer said Narsingh will undergo a “reinstatement test before leaving for Olympics“, a requirement for any athlete who has had an adverse analytical finding. The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI), which had named Parveen Rana as a replacement in a bid to retain the 74kg berth, said it will be writing to the world wrestling body as well as the Olympic organisers to give the berth back to Narsingh.		The wrestler's lawyer said Narsingh will undergo a “reinstatement test before leaving for Olympics“, a requirement for any athlete who has had an adverse analytical finding. The Wrestling Federation of India (WFI), which had named Parveen Rana as a replacement in a bid to retain the 74kg berth, said it will be writing to the world wrestling body as well as the Olympic organisers to give the berth back to Narsingh.
		+
		+	'''Jitesh Kumar,''' the junior wrestler accused of spiking Narsingh's food with banned substances, moved a local court in Sonepat for anticipatory bail, just hours before the National Anti Doping Agency (NADA) cleared Narsingh for the Rio Olympics. The application was moved by his father Surender Singh.
		+
		+	Narsingh had approached the Haryana police with a complaint against the 17-year-old Delhi wrestler last week after which a case was registered at the Rai police station under sections 328 (causing hurt by means of poison with an intent to commit an offence) and 120-B (criminal conspiracy) of the Indian Penal Code.

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 In those difficult times, Narsingh never pushed his own case, always believing that he was doing enough on the mat to let people judge for themselves. As things stand, fortune favoured him.
-The controversy and court fights surrounding the selection between Narsingh and Sushil erupted. olice security was given to Narsingh and he was also under tremendous mental pressure.
+The controversy and court fights surrounding the selection between Narsingh and Sushil erupted. Police security was given to Narsingh and he was also under tremendous mental pressure.
 ==Doping: NADA accepts Narsingh was framed by rival==
 Narsingh gave  blood samples for testing on July 5 2016, before he left for Spain to take part in an invitation tournament — a warm-up event for the wrestlers ahead of the August 2016 Olympics. The report of his 'A' sample test came out positive. Later, he was called for his 'B' sample test, which also returned positive for methandienone - a banned anabolic steroid

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:38, 24 July 2016
Line 50:		Line 50:
	Narsingh gave blood samples for testing on July 5 2016, before he left for Spain to take part in an invitation tournament — a warm-up event for the wrestlers ahead of the August 2016 Olympics. The report of his 'A' sample test came out positive. Later, he was called for his 'B' sample test, which also returned positive for methandienone - a banned anabolic steroid		Narsingh gave blood samples for testing on July 5 2016, before he left for Spain to take part in an invitation tournament — a warm-up event for the wrestlers ahead of the August 2016 Olympics. The report of his 'A' sample test came out positive. Later, he was called for his 'B' sample test, which also returned positive for methandienone - a banned anabolic steroid

−	"I believe that there is foul play involved in this entire episode. Someone has sabotaged my food supplements and water intake... I have undergone three tests in the last month and a half. I appeared for a dope test on the 2nd of June before leaving for a training camp in Bulgaria. I was again tested on my return on the 25th of June and once again on the 5th of July,"," Narsingh responded	+	"I believe that there is foul play involved in this entire episode. Someone has sabotaged my food supplements and water intake... I have undergone three tests in the last month and a half. I appeared for a dope test on the 2nd of June before leaving for a training camp in Bulgaria. I was again tested on my return on the 25th of June and once again on the 5th of July," Narsingh responded

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 The controversy and court fights surrounding the selection between Narsingh and Sushil erupted. olice security was given to Narsingh and he was also under tremendous mental pressure.
 ==Doping ==
-Narsingh gave  blood samples for testing on July 5 2016, before he left for Spain to take part in an invitation tournament — a warm-up event for the wrestlers ahead of the August 2016 Olympics. The report of his 'A' sample test came out positive. Later, he was called for his 'B' sample test, which also returned positive.
+Narsingh gave  blood samples for testing on July 5 2016, before he left for Spain to take part in an invitation tournament — a warm-up event for the wrestlers ahead of the August 2016 Olympics. The report of his 'A' sample test came out positive. Later, he was called for his 'B' sample test, which also returned positive for methandienone - a banned anabolic steroid
-"I believe that there is foul play involved in this entire episode. Someone has sabotaged my food supplements and water intake," Narsingh responded
+"I believe that there is foul play involved in this entire episode. Someone has sabotaged my food supplements and water intake... I have undergone three tests in the last month and a half. I appeared for a dope test on the 2nd of June before leaving for a training camp in Bulgaria. I was again tested on my return on the 25th of June and once again on the 5th of July,"," Narsingh responded