Pdewan: Created page with " {| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|
This article was written in 1916 when conditions were different. Even in
1916 its contents related only..."

2014-02-18T20:00:08Z

Created page with " {| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> This article was written in 1916 when conditions were different. Even in<br/>1916 its contents related only..."

New page

{| class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This article was written in 1916 when conditions were different. Even in<br/>1916 its contents related only to Central India and did not claim to be true <br />of all of India. It has been archived for its historical value as well as for<br/>the insights it gives into British colonial writing about the various communities<br/>of India. Indpaedia neither agrees nor disagrees with the contents of this <br/> article. Readers who wish to add fresh information can create a Part II of this <br/> article. The general rule is that if we have nothing nice to say about <br/> communities other than our own it is best to say nothing at all. <br/>

Readers will be able to edit existing articles and post new articles directly <br/> on their online archival encyclopædia only after its formal launch.

See [[examples]] and a tutorial.</div>
|}

[[Category:India|R]]
[[Category:Communities|R]]
[[Category:Name|Alphabet]]
[[Category:Name|Alphabet]]
From '''The Tribes And Castes Of The Central Provinces Of India '''

By R. V. Russell

Of The Indian Civil Service

Superintendent Of Ethnography, Central Provinces

Assisted By
Rai Bahadur Hira Lal,
Extra Assistant Commissioner

Macmillan And Co., Limited, London, 1916.

''' NOTE 1: The 'Central Provinces' have since been renamed Madhya Pradesh. '''

NOTE 2: While reading please keep in mind that all articles in this series have been scanned from a book. During scanning some errors are bound to occur. Some letters get garbled. Footnotes get inserted into the main text of the article, interrupting the flow. Readers who spot errors might like to correct them, and shift footnotes gone astray to their rightful place.

=Rajput: Huna, Hoon=

This clan retains the name and
1 Bildspur District Gazetteer, chap. * The date is too early, as is usual
ii., in which a full and interesting in these traditions. Though the
account of the Ratanpur kingdom is Ilaihaivansis only founded Ratanpur
given by Mr. C. U. Wills, C.S. about A.D. 1050, their own legends
2 Ibidem, p. 49. put it ten centuries earlier.
' Mr. Crooke's Tribes and Castes,
3,rt. riayobans, '* Rajasthan, i. p. 36.

memory of the Hun barbarian hordes, who invaded India
at or near the epoch of their incursions into Europe. It
is practically extinct ; but in his Western India Colonel Tod
records the discovery of a few families of Hunas in Baroda
State : " At a small village opposite Ometa I discovered
a few huts of Huns, still existing under the ancient name
of Hoon, by which they are known to Hindu history.

There are said to be three or four families of them at the
village of Trisavi, three kos from Baroda, and although
neither feature nor complexion indicate much relation to
the Tartar-visaged Hun, we may ascribe the change to
climate and admixture of blood, as there is little doubt that
they are descended from these invaders, who established a
sovereignty on the Indus in the second and sixth centuries
of the' Christian era, and became so incorporated with the
Rajput population as to obtain a place among the thirty-six
royal races of India, together with the Gete, the Kathi,
and other tribes of the Sacae from Central Asia, whose
descendants still occup)^ the land of the sun-worshipping
Saura or Chaura, no doubt one of the same race."

Rajput: Huna, Hoon - Revision history

Pdewan: Created page with " {| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"| This article was written in 1916 when conditions were different. Even in1916 its contents related only..."

Pdewan: Created page with " {| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|
This article was written in 1916 when conditions were different. Even in
1916 its contents related only..."