<?xml version="1.0"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="http://103.153.58.85/ind/skins/common/feed.css?303"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en-gb">
		<id>http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Rajput%3A_Tribes_Salt%E2%80%93Range</id>
		<title>Rajput: Tribes Salt–Range - Revision history</title>
		<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Rajput%3A_Tribes_Salt%E2%80%93Range"/>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?title=Rajput:_Tribes_Salt%E2%80%93Range&amp;action=history"/>
		<updated>2026-04-18T22:37:13Z</updated>
		<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
		<generator>MediaWiki 1.19.2</generator>

	<entry>
		<id>http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?title=Rajput:_Tribes_Salt%E2%80%93Range&amp;diff=22484&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Pdewan: Pdewan moved page Rajput: Tribes Salt –range to Rajput: Tribes Salt–Range without leaving a redirect</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?title=Rajput:_Tribes_Salt%E2%80%93Range&amp;diff=22484&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2014-04-29T09:06:26Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Pdewan moved page &lt;a href=&quot;/ind/index.php?title=Rajput:_Tribes_Salt_%E2%80%93range&amp;amp;action=edit&amp;amp;redlink=1&quot; class=&quot;new&quot; title=&quot;Rajput: Tribes Salt –range (page does not exist)&quot;&gt;Rajput: Tribes Salt –range&lt;/a&gt; to &lt;a href=&quot;/ind/index.php/Rajput:_Tribes_Salt%E2%80%93Range&quot; title=&quot;Rajput: Tribes Salt–Range&quot;&gt;Rajput: Tribes Salt–Range&lt;/a&gt; without leaving a redirect&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;table class='diff diff-contentalign-left'&gt;
			&lt;tr valign='top'&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;← Older revision&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;td colspan='1' style=&quot;background-color: white; color:black;&quot;&gt;Revision as of 09:06, 29 April 2014&lt;/td&gt;
			&lt;/tr&gt;&lt;/table&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pdewan</name></author>	</entry>

	<entry>
		<id>http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?title=Rajput:_Tribes_Salt%E2%80%93Range&amp;diff=22483&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Pdewan: Created page with &quot;  {| class=&quot;wikitable&quot; |- |colspan=&quot;0&quot;|&lt;div style=&quot;font-size:100%&quot;&gt; This article is an extract from &lt;br/&gt;  PANJAB CASTES &lt;br/&gt;  SIR DENZIL CHARLES JELF IBBETSON, K.C. S.I. &lt;br...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://103.153.58.85/ind/index.php?title=Rajput:_Tribes_Salt%E2%80%93Range&amp;diff=22483&amp;oldid=prev"/>
				<updated>2014-04-29T09:06:01Z</updated>
		
		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;  {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot; |- |colspan=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size:100%&amp;quot;&amp;gt; This article is an extract from &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  PANJAB CASTES &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;  SIR DENZIL CHARLES JELF IBBETSON, K.C. S.I. &amp;lt;br...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;  {| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
|colspan=&amp;quot;0&amp;quot;|&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;font-size:100%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
This article is an extract from &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
PANJAB CASTES &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
SIR DENZIL CHARLES JELF IBBETSON, K.C. S.I. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Being a reprint of the chapter on &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
The Races, Castes and Tribes of &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
the People in the Report on the &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Census of the Panjab published &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
in ''' 1883 ''' by the late Sir Denzil &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Ibbetson, KCSI &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Lahore : &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Printed  by the Superintendent, Government Printing, Punjab, &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
1916. &amp;lt;br/&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
''Indpaedia is an archive. It neither agrees nor disagrees ''&amp;lt;br/&amp;gt; &lt;br /&gt;
''with the contents of this article.''&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
|} &lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:India|R]]&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Communities|R]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=Tribes  Salt –range=&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' The Kahut (No. 7) and Mair  ''' &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I have &lt;br /&gt;
classed the Kahut as a separate caste under No. 103 of Table VIIIA. But they probably belong &lt;br /&gt;
to the group we are now considering, and I therefore show them in Abstract No. 81 and discuss &lt;br /&gt;
them here. With them I notice the Mair, for whom I have no separate figures ; and with these &lt;br /&gt;
two are commonly associated the Kasar, who will bo described under the head Mughal. These &lt;br /&gt;
three tribes occupy the Dhain country in tahstl Chakwil of Jahlam j the Kahuta holding Kahutani &lt;br /&gt;
or its southern portion, the Mair the centre, and the Kasar the north. All three state that &lt;br /&gt;
they came from the Jammu hills, joined Babar's army, and were located by him in their &lt;br /&gt;
present abodes which wcre then almost uninhabited. They seem to have been ever violent and &lt;br /&gt;
masterful, and to have retained their independence in a singular degree. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A graphic description of &lt;br /&gt;
their character by Sir. Thomson is quoted at length under the head Mughal, to which I must refer &lt;br /&gt;
the reader. They most probably belong to the group of Rajput or quasi-Rajput tribes who hold &lt;br /&gt;
the hills on either hank of the Jahlam, and the Kahuta hills of Rawalpindi now held by the &lt;br /&gt;
Ketwal and Dhanial, and the town of Kahuta now in the hands of the Janjua, still bear their &lt;br /&gt;
name. They now belong to the Salt-range and not to the Jahlam hills, but I have put them in the &lt;br /&gt;
Abstract among the tribes with whom they are probably connected by origin. They are sometimes &lt;br /&gt;
said to be Awan, as indeed are the Dhund also. Their bards claim for them Mughal origin, and &lt;br /&gt;
it is quite possible that some of them may have returned themselves as either Awan or Mughal. Of &lt;br /&gt;
the 8,766 Kahut returned from Jahlam, all but 293 have shown Mughal as their clan. Besides the &lt;br /&gt;
Kahut shown under No. 103, Table VIIIA., 177 Rajputs have returned their tribe as Kahut. The &lt;br /&gt;
more respectable Mair call themselves Minhas, probably the same word as the well-known Manhas &lt;br /&gt;
tribe presently to be described ; and it may be that the Mair have been returned as Manhas &lt;br /&gt;
Rajputs. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' The Jodra and Gheba '''  — I have no separate figures for these tribes, the only Gheba who have &lt;br /&gt;
returned themselves as such being apparently 105, of whom 89 are in the Peshawar division &lt;br /&gt;
They may have returned themselves as Mughal or some caste other than Rajput, or as some &lt;br /&gt;
other Rajput tribe, or as Rajput simply without specifying any tribe. The tradition which &lt;br /&gt;
makes the Sial, Tiwana, and Gheba descendants of Saiuo, Teno, and Gheo, the three sons &lt;br /&gt;
of Rai Shankar Punwar, has already been noticed under the head of Sial. An amended &lt;br /&gt;
genealogy is given at page 520 of Griffin's Punjab Chiefs. The Sial and Tiwana appear to admit &lt;br /&gt;
the relationship, and, as already noticed under the head Dhund, it is not at all impossible that this &lt;br /&gt;
group of Rajput tribes may be of Punwar origin. The Gheba are said to have come to the Pan jab &lt;br /&gt;
some time after the Sial and Tiwana, and to have settled in the wild hilly country of Fateh Jhano&lt;br /&gt;
and Pindi Gheb in Rawalpindi. Here they held their own against the Awans, Gakkhars and &lt;br /&gt;
neighbouring tribes till Ran jit Singh subdued them. The Jodra are said to have come 'from &lt;br /&gt;
Jammu, or according to another story from Hindustan, whence also Colonel Cracroft says that the &lt;br /&gt;
Gheba traditions trace that tribe, and to have held their present tract before the Gheba settled &lt;br /&gt;
alongside of them. They now occupy the eastern half of the Pindi Gheb, and the Gheba the &lt;br /&gt;
western half of the Fateh Jhang tahsil in Rawalpindi, the two tracts marehing with each other. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I am informed, though unfortunately I cannot remember who was my authority, that the &lt;br /&gt;
Gheba is really a branch of the original Jodra tribe that quarrelled with the others, and took the &lt;br /&gt;
name of Gheba which till then had been simply a title used in the tribe ; and the fact that the &lt;br /&gt;
town of Pindi Gheb was built and is still held by the Jocka, and not by the Gheba, lends some &lt;br /&gt;
support to the statement. The history of the Gheba family is told at pages 538 ff  and of the &lt;br /&gt;
Jodra family at pages 535 ff of Sir Lepel Griffin's Punjdb Chiefs. Colonel Cracroft describes &lt;br /&gt;
the Jodra as fine, spirited fellows who delight in Held sports, have horses and hawks, are often &lt;br /&gt;
brawlers, and are ever ready to turn out and fight out their grievances, formerly with swords, &lt;br /&gt;
and now with the more humble weapons of sticks and stones.The same writer says that the &lt;br /&gt;
Gheba are a fine, hardy race of men, full of fire and energy, not addicted to crime, thou^'h their &lt;br /&gt;
readiness to resent insult or injury, real or imagined, or to join in hand-to-hand fights for their &lt;br /&gt;
rights in land, and their factions with the Jodra and Alpial, are notorious.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
''' The Januja (No. 8) ''' — The head-quarters of the Janjua are the eastern Salt-range, but they &lt;br /&gt;
are foimd in small numbers throughout the Multan and Derajat divisions, and in°Hushyarpar &lt;br /&gt;
General Cunnhigham thinks that they are Aryan, and a branch of the Anuwan, Awan, or sons of &lt;br /&gt;
Anu, and connects Janj the first syllable of their name, and Chach a tract in Rawalpindi, with the &lt;br /&gt;
old kings of the Hund on the Indus who are said by Masaudi to have borne the name of Chach &lt;br /&gt;
or Jaj. Six Lepel Griffin is inclined to think that they are a branch of the Yadubansi &lt;br /&gt;
Rajputs, now chiefly represented by the Bhatti, who held Kashmir iill the Mahommedan&lt;br /&gt;
conquest of the Panjah, and whose history has been brieily sketched under the head  Bhatti ; &lt;br /&gt;
and Abu Fazl also make-; theni a branch of the Yadu stock. They themselves say they are &lt;br /&gt;
descedants of Raja Mai Rathor, who migrated about 980 A. P, either from Jadhpur or from &lt;br /&gt;
Kanauj to the Jahlam and built Malot; and the Janjua genealogies show a striking unifor&lt;br /&gt;
mity in only giving from 18 to 23 generations since Raja Mal. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
One of his sons is said to have &lt;br /&gt;
been called Jud, the old name of the Salt-range ; and Mr. Brandreth states that only the descend&lt;br /&gt;
ants of his brother Wrr are now known as Janjua. If this be so, and if the identification by &lt;br /&gt;
General Cunningham of Bibar's .Jud with the Awan bc accepted, the connection of the two tribes &lt;br /&gt;
by traditional decent from a common ancestor follows. The Janjua once held almost the whole &lt;br /&gt;
of the Salt-range Tract, but were gradually dispossessed by the Gakkhars in the north and by the &lt;br /&gt;
Awans (if they be a separate people) in the west ; and they now bold only the central and eastern &lt;br /&gt;
parts of the range as tribal territory, which is exactly what they held at the time of Babar's &lt;br /&gt;
invasion. They still occupy a social position in the tract which is second only to that of the &lt;br /&gt;
Gakkbars, and are always addressed as Raja. They do not permit widow marriage. The &lt;br /&gt;
history of the tribe is told fully at paragraphs 50 ff of Hrandreth's Jahlam Report, and that of &lt;br /&gt;
its leading family at pages 602 ff of the Panjah Chiefs. The tribe is very fully described by &lt;br /&gt;
Mr. Thomson in his Jahlam Report. Ho too makes them Rathor Rajputs from Jodhpur, and says &lt;br /&gt;
they are the only undoubtedly and admittedly Rajput tribe in Jahlam. He describes them as &lt;br /&gt;
physically well-luuking, with line hands and feet; mucb given to military service, especially in &lt;br /&gt;
the cavalry ; poor agriculturists, bad men of business, and with great pride of race.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Pdewan</name></author>	</entry>

	</feed>