Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and India - Revision history

Pdewan: /* Pressure from the dairy cooperatives of Gujarat */

2025-08-09T07:02:07Z

‎Pressure from the dairy cooperatives of Gujarat

Pdewan: /* Why India decided not to join RCEP agreement */

2025-08-09T07:00:11Z

‎Why India decided not to join RCEP agreement

Pdewan: Pdewan moved page Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) to Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and India without leaving a redirect

2025-08-09T06:56:14Z

Pdewan moved page Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) to Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) and India without leaving a redirect

Jyoti at 07:38, 14 June 2021

2021-06-14T07:38:23Z

Jyoti at 21:43, 13 June 2021

2021-06-13T21:43:36Z

Jyoti: Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.
Additional information ma..."

2021-01-26T10:53:50Z

Created page with "{| class="wikitable" |- |colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%"> This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/> Additional information ma..."

New page

{| class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.<br/>
Additional information may please be sent as messages to the Facebook <br/>community, [http://www.facebook.com/Indpaedia Indpaedia.com]. All information used will be gratefully <br/>acknowledged in your name.
</div>
|}

[[Category:India |R ]]
[[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources |R ]]
[[Category:Foreign Relations |R ]]

= Revenue foregone/ to be foregone =
==2019-20==
[https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F07%2F29&entity=Ar01310&sk=B425014F&mode=text Sidhartha, July 29, 2019: ''The Times of India'']

[[File: India’s trade with RCEP countries, 2018-19.jpg| India’s trade with RCEP countries, 2018-19 <br/> From: [https://epaper.timesgroup.com/Olive/ODN/TimesOfIndia/shared/ShowArticle.aspx?doc=TOIDEL%2F2019%2F07%2F29&entity=Ar01310&sk=B425014F&mode=text Sidhartha, July 29, 2019: ''The Times of India'']|frame|500px]]

Revenue concessions to RCEP may touch ₹60k cr

Govt Points To Gaps In Asean Trade Pact, Fears Impact On ‘Make In India’ Initiative

New Delhi:

Hidden in the Budget documents is a number that has gone virtually unnoticed — India’s revenue foregone due to the trade agreement with Asean more than doubled to nearly Rs 26,000 crore in 2018-19 from the previous fiscal, as it allowed duty-free and lower duty import of more goods from the trading bloc.
Last fiscal’s giveaway — which is as much as the Centre hopes to collect through the super-rich tax this year — may rise in the coming years as the current utilisation of the trade pact is only around 40% of its potential. But the bigger fear for policy makers, especially those in the finance ministry, is the revenue foregone due to the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP) agreement that is currently under negotiation. With the talks gathering steam, the revenue department has raised the red flag, arguing that concessions could easily top Rs 30,000 crore a year once they kick in and will nearly double to Rs 60,000 crore after the agreement is fully in force.

Many, however, see it as a notional revenue loss since a large part of the trade would not take place in the absence of the free trade deal. Going by the experience of past agreements, India’s imports from a trading partner have gone up at a faster pace than exports, with little gains accruing on the services front.

In contrast, India stands to gain little as import duty in some of the countries is much lower. World Bank data base estimated that in 2017, India’s average duty was 5.2% (including agriculture goods), compared to 3.8% in China and 2.1% in Indonesia.

Besides, India’s imports from the 15 countries added up to around $173 billion, while exports were of the order of $68 billion. “Low duty imports will have a massive impact on our manufacturing sector. We can virtually forget about the Make in India,” said a revenue officer. It will not only result in trade creation, which will lead to domestic production being replaced by imports, but also see goods from other countries, such as the US, getting replaced by cheaper rivals from China and Vietnam, officials warned.

During a recent meeting with the Asean troika led by Indonesia, commerce and industry minister Piyush Goyal himself highlighted at least nine concerns with the India-Asean Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement (CECA) that has been in place for close to a decade now, in a suggestion to ensure that RCEP does not suffer from such drawbacks.

Like RCEP, where the entire focus is on removal of tariffs, Asean too saw a massive import duty cut. But, Goyal pointed out that non-tariff barriers were preventing India’s exports from entering several markets. For instance, in Japan and South Korea, steel exports meet barriers erected by local industry. Several officials have pointed out that there is a need to discuss ways to prevent non-tariff barriers from holding up exports.

Similarly, the government pointed out that the review mechanism needs to be robust as India’s concerns on Asean CECA haven’t been addressed since 2011, with the 10 countries putting the blame on each other. “If there are more countries, a review may be even tougher,” said an officer.

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 ===Pressure from the dairy cooperatives of Gujarat ===
-[ https://indianexpress.com/article/business/india-us-trade-talks-agriculture-red-lines-10179071/  Anil Sasi/ August 9, 2025 / ''The Indian Express'' ]
+[https://indianexpress.com/article/business/india-us-trade-talks-agriculture-red-lines-10179071/  Anil Sasi/ August 9, 2025 / ''The Indian Express'']
@@ Line 52: / Line 52: @@
 Coming amid a chorus of protests from stakeholders, the most potent catalyst that proved instrumental to this pivot by the NDA government were several thousand handwritten letters posted by women who were part of cooperative organisations, a large majority of them from dairy cooperatives of Gujarat. In these similarly-worded letters, the women from the cooperatives flagged concerns about the potentially deleterious impact of the deal on the agri sector and their respective livelihoods. All these were mailed to the post box in South Block, with the sheer volumes of the incoming letters serving to effectively amplify the concerns that was already resonating in policy circles regarding the ominous presence of China in the grouping and the potential for cheap Chinese goods to flood India’s markets and harm domestic industries, especially in sectors like agri, dairy and steel. Just weeks later, India conveyed its decision to pull out.
 [[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources|R REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:00, 9 August 2025
Line 43:		Line 43:

	* Earlier, under the UPA government, India had opened 74% of its market to Asean countries but richer countries like Indonesia opened only 50% of their markets for India. It also agreed to explore an India-China FTA in 2007 and join RCEP negotiations with China in 2011-12. However, the impact of these decisions resulted in increased trade deficit with RCEP nations - from $7 billion in 2004 to $78 billion in 2014.		* Earlier, under the UPA government, India had opened 74% of its market to Asean countries but richer countries like Indonesia opened only 50% of their markets for India. It also agreed to explore an India-China FTA in 2007 and join RCEP negotiations with China in 2011-12. However, the impact of these decisions resulted in increased trade deficit with RCEP nations - from $7 billion in 2004 to $78 billion in 2014.
		+
		+
		+	===Pressure from the dairy cooperatives of Gujarat ===
		+	[ https://indianexpress.com/article/business/india-us-trade-talks-agriculture-red-lines-10179071/ Anil Sasi/ August 9, 2025 / ''The Indian Express'' ]
		+
		+
		+	India’s last-minute decision in November 2019 to withdraw from joining the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), a mega-regional pact and the most expansive regional trade agreement that India had ever negotiated, was triggered by a belated rethink in New Delhi policy circles.
		+
		+	Coming amid a chorus of protests from stakeholders, the most potent catalyst that proved instrumental to this pivot by the NDA government were several thousand handwritten letters posted by women who were part of cooperative organisations, a large majority of them from dairy cooperatives of Gujarat. In these similarly-worded letters, the women from the cooperatives flagged concerns about the potentially deleterious impact of the deal on the agri sector and their respective livelihoods. All these were mailed to the post box in South Block, with the sheer volumes of the incoming letters serving to effectively amplify the concerns that was already resonating in policy circles regarding the ominous presence of China in the grouping and the potential for cheap Chinese goods to flood India’s markets and harm domestic industries, especially in sectors like agri, dairy and steel. Just weeks later, India conveyed its decision to pull out.
		+
		+	[[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources\|R REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)
		+	REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP) AND INDIA]]
		+	[[Category:Foreign Relations\|R REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)
		+	REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP) AND INDIA]]
		+	[[Category:India\|R REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)
		+	REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP) AND INDIA]]
		+	[[Category:Pages with broken file links\|REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)
		+	REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP) AND INDIA]]

	= Revenue foregone/ to be foregone =		= Revenue foregone/ to be foregone =

@@ Line 71: / Line 71: @@
 Similarly, the government pointed out that the review mechanism needs to be robust as India’s concerns on Asean CECA haven’t been addressed since 2011, with the 10 countries putting the blame on each other. “If there are more countries, a review may be even tougher,” said an officer.
-[[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources|R
+=Trade with RCEP countries=
 REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)]]
-[[Category:Foreign Relations|R
+[[Category:Foreign Relations|R REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)
 REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)]]
-[[Category:India|R
+[[Category:India|R REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)
 REGIONAL COMPREHENSIVE ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP (RCEP)]]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 |}
-[[Category:India |R ]]
-[[Category:Economy-Industry-Resources |R ]]
-[[Category:Foreign Relations |R ]]
 = Revenue foregone/ to be foregone =
@@ Line 37: / Line 70: @@
 Similarly, the government pointed out that the review mechanism needs to be robust as India’s concerns on Asean CECA haven’t been addressed since 2011, with the 10 countries putting the blame on each other. “If there are more countries, a review may be even tougher,” said an officer.