Parents, children and the law: India
(Created page with "[[File: Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Citizens Act, 2007.jpg|Graphic courtesy: [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com//Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=CARE-FOR-ELDERS-...") |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
[[Category:India |M ]] | [[Category:India |M ]] | ||
[[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary |M ]] | [[Category:Law,Constitution,Judiciary |M ]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | = Stepsons must help childless stepmother: HC = | ||
+ | [http://epaperbeta.timesofindia.com/Article.aspx?eid=31808&articlexml=Stepsons-must-help-childless-stepmother-HC-18072015013025 ''The Times of India''], Jul 18 2015 | ||
+ | |||
+ | Chhattisgarh high court has upheld that a childless stepmother is entitled to maintenance from her stepsons. | ||
+ | |||
+ | A single bench of Justice Sanjay K Agrawal dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Deenbandhu and Kanwar Lal, questioning the order of a family court in Kanker district that directed a 70-year-old woman to get maintenance of Rs 1,000 from her stepson. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Petitioners counsel D N Prajapathi argued that Section 125 of code of criminal procedure code, 1973, does not include the stepmother, who is unable to maintain herself.Non-applicant Birajo Bai's counsel supported the order of family court, citing judgments of other high courts. |
Revision as of 20:09, 19 July 2015

This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. |
Stepsons must help childless stepmother: HC
The Times of India, Jul 18 2015
Chhattisgarh high court has upheld that a childless stepmother is entitled to maintenance from her stepsons.
A single bench of Justice Sanjay K Agrawal dismissed a criminal revision petition filed by Deenbandhu and Kanwar Lal, questioning the order of a family court in Kanker district that directed a 70-year-old woman to get maintenance of Rs 1,000 from her stepson.
Petitioners counsel D N Prajapathi argued that Section 125 of code of criminal procedure code, 1973, does not include the stepmother, who is unable to maintain herself.Non-applicant Birajo Bai's counsel supported the order of family court, citing judgments of other high courts.