Gender equality: South Asia
| Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
However, when we look at the corresponding figure for men in India, it shows that they spend only 8% of their time on non-market activities. Such a sharp contrast between the way men and women allocate their time is not matched by any other country. | However, when we look at the corresponding figure for men in India, it shows that they spend only 8% of their time on non-market activities. Such a sharp contrast between the way men and women allocate their time is not matched by any other country. | ||
| + | =See also= | ||
| + | 1. [[Assam]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. [[Christians: India]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. [[Religion: India]] | ||
Revision as of 17:06, 26 August 2015
This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content. Readers will be able to edit existing articles and post new articles directly |
Gender equality in South Asia
When India’s human development index is adjusted for gender equality, it becomes South Asia’s worst performing country after Afghanistan, new numbers in the UNDP’s Human Development Report 2013 show. Pakistan, Nepal and Bangladesh, which are poorer than India and have lower HDIs, all do comparatively better than India when it comes to gender equality.
The new UNDP report, released on Thursday, ranks India 136th out of 186 countries, five ranks below postwar Iraq, on the HDI. The HDI is a composite indicator composed of three equally weighted measures for education, health and income.
On the newly constituted multi-dimensional poverty index (MPI), which identifies multiple deprivations in the same households in education, health and standard of living, only 29 countries do worse than India (though data sets are from varying periods of time across nations). The MPI puts India’s poverty head count ratio at 54%, higher than Bangladesh and Nepal.
This was even as India did extremely well economically. India and China doubled output per capita in less than 20 years, at a scale the UNDP has said was “unprecedented in speed and scale”. “Never in history have the living conditions and prospects of so many people changed so dramatically and so fast,” the UNDP said. It took Britain 150 years to do the same after the Industrial Revolution and the United States, which industrialized later, took 50 years.
On the whole, developing countries have been steadily improving their human development records. No country has done worse in 2012 than in 2000, while the same was not true for the preceding decade. India, Bangladesh and China are among 40 countries that have done better on the HDI than was predicted for them in 1990. By 2030, more than 80% of the world’s middle class is projected to be in the global south; within Asia, India and China will make up 75% of the middle class.
The HDR identifies three drivers of human development transformation in the countries of the global south — proactive developmental states, tapping of global markets and determined social policy innovation.
Gender: India better than neighbours
New Delhi: Women don’t seem to be doing too badly in India, when we consider just South Asia. India’s gender-related development index (GDI) rank is 96 out of 177 countries, one of the best in the region if we do not count Sri Lanka, way ahead at rank 68. But, as always, the ranking hides more than it reveals about gender equality.
While Sri Lanka soars ahead on most counts, when it comes to women’s political participation, it is behind most countries in the region and so is India. Pakistan leads the way with 20.4%, highest percentage of women in Parliament. In Sri Lanka, the figure is 4.9% and in India 9.2%. Bangladesh too, is better off with 14.8% of seats in Parliament held by women.
If female life expectancy in India is 65.3, Bangladesh is not too far behind at 64.2 years. Sri Lanka is way ahead with a female life expectancy of 71.3 and its adult female literacy rate is almost double the Indian figure of 47.8%. India’s only comfort is that it has better literacy rates than Pakistan and Nepal. In gross school enrolment of women too, India’s percentage is just 58, same as Bangladesh. On most counts, including the GDI ranking China (rank 64) is far ahead of all the countries in South Asia.
The estimated earned income of women in India, $1,471 per capita in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms, might be high in the region, but again Sri Lankan women earn almost twice as much and Chinese women three times the amount.
Yet again, Bangladesh is close behind India with it’s women earning $1,170, while in Pakistan and Nepal, they earn less than $1,000 per capita. Interestingly, when it comes to the proportion of females involved in economic activity, Sri Lanka and India are almost equally badly off - India’s rate is 34% and Sri Lanka’s is 35%. Here, Bangladesh does a lot better with 52.9% and Nepal with 49.7%. What is really revealing in terms of gender disparity is a comparison of the time spent by men and women on market-oriented activity as opposed to non-market activities, which would mean work that is not paid for. Women in India spend 35% of their time on market activity and the rest on non-market activity.
This figure in itself is not too shocking because there is a similar divide, and sometimes a sharper one, even in the developed countries, between time spent by women on market and non-market activities. However, when we look at the corresponding figure for men in India, it shows that they spend only 8% of their time on non-market activities. Such a sharp contrast between the way men and women allocate their time is not matched by any other country.
See also
1. Assam
