Reliance Industries Ltd.

From Indpaedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Hindi English French German Italian Portuguese Russian Spanish

This is a collection of articles archived for the excellence of their content.
You can help by converting these articles into an encyclopaedia-style entry,
deleting portions of the kind nor mally not used in encyclopaedia entries.
Please also fill in missing details; put categories, headings and sub-headings;
and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.

Readers will be able to edit existing articles and post new articles directly
on their online archival encyclopædia only after its formal launch.

See examples and a tutorial.

Contents

Gas

KG-D6 Andhra offshore block/ field

Govt fines RIL $1.6bn for using ONGC gas

Govt fines RIL $1.6bn for using ONGC gas, Nov 05 2016 : The Times of India

KG-D6 Andhra offshore block ONGC vs. RIL, 2013-16


Co Plans Arbitration, Says Demand Based On `Misreading Of Key Elements' Of PSC

The stage has been set for another round of legal slugfest between India's biggest private sector oil company and the government, with the oil ministry asking Reliance Industries and its partners in the KG-D6 Andhra offshore Block to pay $1.55 billion (approximately Rs 10,000 crore based on current exchange rate) as cost of gas that migrated to their side from an adjacent block belonging to state-run ONGC.

RIL responded to the demand note, sent on Thursday to it, British major BP and Canadian explorer Niko, by saying it proposed to initiate arbitration since the demand was based on “misreading and misinterpretation of key elements of the PSC (production sharing contract) and is without precedent in the oil and gas industry anywhere in the world“. “RIL proposes to invoke the dispute resolution mechanism in the PSC and issue a Notice of Arbitration to the government. RIL remains convinced of being able to fully justify and vindicate its position that the government's claim is not sustainable,“ the company said in a statement.

“According to the government, the Contractor is restricted to producing only that quantity of hydrocarbon as they existed at the point in time when the PSC was signed.This approach overlooks the fundamental fact that at that stage the work of exploration of the block has not even commenced and a complete lack of data makes it impossible to estimate the quantity of hydrocarbons available in the block.“ “The liability of the contractor has not been established by any process known to law and the quantification of the purported claim is without any basis and arbitrary .“

RIL and the government are already engaged in several international arbitrations with more than $5 billion at stake. The arbitrations have been initiated on issues ranging from penalty imposed for failure to meet the promised output targets and gas pricing in KG-D6 to cost calculations in the Panna-Mukta and Tapti fields, which have now been abandoned.

The ministry has deman ded $1.47 billion for 338.332 million units (measured in British thermal unit) of gas that migrated from ONGC's field in seven years ended March 2016. From this amount, $71.71million royalty that RIL paid on this gas was demanded. But an interest of $149.86 million, charged at the rate of 2% above Libor, was added to the amount to work out the total demand. The ministry also demanded $177 million in profit petroleum (government's share of profit) from the partners after disallowing certain costs previously as a penalty for RIL's failure to meet output targets.

The demand note follows the direction set by the panel the ministry had constituted under retired Justice A P Shah to adjudicate the report by US-based reservoir experts, DeGolyer and MacNaugton, appointed at the behest of the Delhi High Court. The report had confirmed ONGC's claim on migration of gas from its idle field into RIL's block, which started production in 2009.

The Shah panel upheld the report and said RIL and its partners had derived “undue enrichment“ from gas migrating from ONGC's block. It also said the compensation should go to the government since it is the public trustee of all natural resources. This is a sore point with ONGC since it was the original claimant for compensation -and some industry watchers said rightfully so -and had moved the court against RIL to pay up.

“The committee has concluded that the contractor's (RILBP-Niko) production of migrated gas and retention of ensuing benefits amounts to unjust enrichment, since the production sharing contract (PSC)... does not permit a contractor to produce and sell migrated gas,“ the demand note said.

Vimal

RIL selling 49% in ‘Vimal’ to Chinese textile company

Piyush Pandey, December 10, 2014

Through the late 1970s and early 1980s, the distinctive tune of ‘Only Vimal’ ads became instantly recognizable to millions of Indians. From top models to Bollywood hearthrobs and cricket stars, they all featured in the iconic ads. As the clothing brand went from strength to strength, so did its owner—an initially obscure company founded by Dhirubhai Ambani called Reliance Textiles that was in 1985 rechristened Reliance Industries Ltd.

Vimal

While nostalgia may be a powerful factor, savvy tycoons don't allow it to overcome business sense. Which is why RIL, India's biggest company now led by Mukesh Ambani, has decided to sell a 49% stake in the textiles business to the $3-billion Chinese textile giant Shandong Ruyi Science & Technology Group for an undisclosed sum. RIL will hold 51% in the new JV. The textile business is located at Naroda near Ahmedabad and was set up in 1966. But it now contributes $300-350 million, or less than 1%, to the overall $65-billion annual revenues of RIL. In 2012, RIL had appointed bankers to sell its textile business but the sale was called off due to a tepid market and lack of buyers.

“Our joint venture with Ruyi Group will help Reliance reposition its textile business on a high-growth path,” said Nikhil R Meswani, executive director, RIL. Ruyi, a leading textile company in China, has a global presence, including in America, Europe, Japan, Australia, New Zealand and China. It has a portfolio of world-renowned brands such as ‘Taylor & Lodge’, ‘Harris Tweed’, ‘Royal Ruyi China’, ‘Nogara Italy’ and ‘Indios Italy’. Ruyi also operates in India under the ‘Georgia Gullini’ brand in the worsted suiting segment of the market. This business operation and its other activities would get realigned to strengthen the JV.

Investment adviser S P Tulsian believes that the deal size would not be significant, given that none of the textile companies in that space is valued at over $100 million.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox
Translate