| Variable | Value |
|---|
| Edit count of user (user_editcount) | |
| Name of user account (user_name) | 31.184.238.68 |
| Time email address was confirmed (user_emailconfirm) | |
| Age of user account (user_age) | 0 |
| Groups (including implicit) user is in (user_groups) | *
|
| Page ID (article_articleid) | 2213 |
| Page namespace (article_namespace) | 0 |
| Page title (without namespace) (article_text) | Tehri dam |
| Full page title (article_prefixedtext) | Tehri dam |
| article_restrictions_create | |
| Edit protection level of the page (article_restrictions_edit) | |
| Move protection level of the page (article_restrictions_move) | |
| article_restrictions_upload | |
| Last ten users to contribute to the page (article_recent_contributors) | Pdewan
|
| Action (action) | edit |
| Edit summary/reason (summary) | /* 2013: How Tehri held [the] raging Ganga & saved lives */ |
| Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (minor_edit) | |
| Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext) | {| class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This is a collection of newspaper articles selected for the excellence of their content.<br/>You can help by converting it into an encyclopaedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br/>Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br/>and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br/>
See [[examples]] and a tutorial.</div>
|}
[[Category:India|T]]
[[Category: Rivers |G]]
[[Category:Development| T]]
[[Category:Places|T]]
==2013: How Tehri held [the] raging Ganga & saved lives==
Pradeep Thakur TNN 2013/06/27
[http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/06/27&PageLabel=12&EntityId=Ar01200&ViewMode=HTML The Times of India]
New Delhi: The water levels in the Tehri dam were low at the start of the monsoon in June 2013. This proved a critical factor in the dam retaining waters of an engorged Bhagirathi and preventing a 10-12 feet rise in the Ganga at Rishikesh that could have been ruinous for the town and its ashrams.
A report said the fury of nature in Uttarakhand was such that waters rose as high as a four-storeyed building at Devprayag, where the Alaknanda and Bhagirathi meet, in a 24-hour period after the June 16-17 cloudburst. The rise at Devprayag, Rishikesh and Haridwar could have been much higher but for the Tehri dam.
On the morning of June 16, the discharge of water in Bhagirathi was 18,600 cusecs at the Tehri site. By evening, it went up to 1,05,000 cusecs and next morning touched 2,44,000 cusecs. This led to a phenomenal rise in the river level at Devprayag by 11 meters. By then, the inflow from Alaknanda was already 2,45,000 cusecs.
This rise was unprecedented and could have resulted in total destruction of Rishikesh town and much of Haridwar if the flow of Bhagirathi was not contained by the Tehri reservoir, said officials of the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (THDC), who made the first assessment of the flash floods.
As it was the start of the monsoon and the reservoir was relatively empty, authorities retained 95% of Bhagirathi’s fury and maintained a release of only 14,000 cusecs instead of 2,44,000 cusecs and prevented a rise in water level by at least 5 meters (more than 16 feet) in Devprayag and 10-12 feet at Rishikesh, about 60 km away as the river flows.
“All ashrams along the Ganga in Rishikesh would have been washed away and Ram Jhula would have been submerged if the level had further gone up by even 3 meters,” said a director at THDC. Haridwar too would have witnessed largescale devastation.
At Devprayag, the river level was 458.25 m at 11 am on June 16. The next day around the same time, it had risen to 469.10 m. It would have been a catastrophe downstream of Devprayag, in Rishikesh and Haridwar, if instead of 14,000 cusecs, 2,44,000 cusecs was added from Bhagirathi . |
| New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext) | {| class="wikitable"
|-
|colspan="0"|<div style="font-size:100%">
This is a collection of newspaper articles selected for the excellence of their content.<br/>You can help by converting it into an encyclopaedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br/>Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br/>and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br/>
See [[examples]] and a tutorial.</div>
|}
[[Category:India|T]]
[[Category: Rivers |G]]
[[Category:Development| T]]
[[Category:Places|T]]
VDdkBL <a href="http://ejqhrzgtgdrw.com/">ejqhrzgtgdrw</a>, [url=http://skornlzaeohz.com/]skornlzaeohz[/url], [link=http://tkyyxhhnmity.com/]tkyyxhhnmity[/link], http://ezmuapkjwgpp.com/ |
| Unified diff of changes made by edit (edit_diff) | @@ -11,23 +11,4 @@
[[Category:Development| T]]
[[Category:Places|T]]
-==2013: How Tehri held [the] raging Ganga & saved lives==
-
-Pradeep Thakur TNN 2013/06/27
-
-[http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/06/27&PageLabel=12&EntityId=Ar01200&ViewMode=HTML The Times of India]
-
-
-New Delhi: The water levels in the Tehri dam were low at the start of the monsoon in June 2013. This proved a critical factor in the dam retaining waters of an engorged Bhagirathi and preventing a 10-12 feet rise in the Ganga at Rishikesh that could have been ruinous for the town and its ashrams.
-
-A report said the fury of nature in Uttarakhand was such that waters rose as high as a four-storeyed building at Devprayag, where the Alaknanda and Bhagirathi meet, in a 24-hour period after the June 16-17 cloudburst. The rise at Devprayag, Rishikesh and Haridwar could have been much higher but for the Tehri dam.
-
-On the morning of June 16, the discharge of water in Bhagirathi was 18,600 cusecs at the Tehri site. By evening, it went up to 1,05,000 cusecs and next morning touched 2,44,000 cusecs. This led to a phenomenal rise in the river level at Devprayag by 11 meters. By then, the inflow from Alaknanda was already 2,45,000 cusecs.
-
-This rise was unprecedented and could have resulted in total destruction of Rishikesh town and much of Haridwar if the flow of Bhagirathi was not contained by the Tehri reservoir, said officials of the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (THDC), who made the first assessment of the flash floods.
-
-As it was the start of the monsoon and the reservoir was relatively empty, authorities retained 95% of Bhagirathi’s fury and maintained a release of only 14,000 cusecs instead of 2,44,000 cusecs and prevented a rise in water level by at least 5 meters (more than 16 feet) in Devprayag and 10-12 feet at Rishikesh, about 60 km away as the river flows.
-
-“All ashrams along the Ganga in Rishikesh would have been washed away and Ram Jhula would have been submerged if the level had further gone up by even 3 meters,” said a director at THDC. Haridwar too would have witnessed largescale devastation.
-
-At Devprayag, the river level was 458.25 m at 11 am on June 16. The next day around the same time, it had risen to 469.10 m. It would have been a catastrophe downstream of Devprayag, in Rishikesh and Haridwar, if instead of 14,000 cusecs, 2,44,000 cusecs was added from Bhagirathi .
+VDdkBL <a href="http://ejqhrzgtgdrw.com/">ejqhrzgtgdrw</a>, [url=http://skornlzaeohz.com/]skornlzaeohz[/url], [link=http://tkyyxhhnmity.com/]tkyyxhhnmity[/link], http://ezmuapkjwgpp.com/ |
| New page size (new_size) | 784 |
| Old page size (old_size) | 3011 |
| Size change in edit (edit_delta) | -2227 |
| Lines added in edit (added_lines) | VDdkBL <a href="http://ejqhrzgtgdrw.com/">ejqhrzgtgdrw</a>, [url=http://skornlzaeohz.com/]skornlzaeohz[/url], [link=http://tkyyxhhnmity.com/]tkyyxhhnmity[/link], http://ezmuapkjwgpp.com/
|
| Lines removed in edit (removed_lines) | ==2013: How Tehri held [the] raging Ganga & saved lives==
Pradeep Thakur TNN 2013/06/27
[http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/06/27&PageLabel=12&EntityId=Ar01200&ViewMode=HTML The Times of India]
New Delhi: The water levels in the Tehri dam were low at the start of the monsoon in June 2013. This proved a critical factor in the dam retaining waters of an engorged Bhagirathi and preventing a 10-12 feet rise in the Ganga at Rishikesh that could have been ruinous for the town and its ashrams.
A report said the fury of nature in Uttarakhand was such that waters rose as high as a four-storeyed building at Devprayag, where the Alaknanda and Bhagirathi meet, in a 24-hour period after the June 16-17 cloudburst. The rise at Devprayag, Rishikesh and Haridwar could have been much higher but for the Tehri dam.
On the morning of June 16, the discharge of water in Bhagirathi was 18,600 cusecs at the Tehri site. By evening, it went up to 1,05,000 cusecs and next morning touched 2,44,000 cusecs. This led to a phenomenal rise in the river level at Devprayag by 11 meters. By then, the inflow from Alaknanda was already 2,45,000 cusecs.
This rise was unprecedented and could have resulted in total destruction of Rishikesh town and much of Haridwar if the flow of Bhagirathi was not contained by the Tehri reservoir, said officials of the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (THDC), who made the first assessment of the flash floods.
As it was the start of the monsoon and the reservoir was relatively empty, authorities retained 95% of Bhagirathi’s fury and maintained a release of only 14,000 cusecs instead of 2,44,000 cusecs and prevented a rise in water level by at least 5 meters (more than 16 feet) in Devprayag and 10-12 feet at Rishikesh, about 60 km away as the river flows.
“All ashrams along the Ganga in Rishikesh would have been washed away and Ram Jhula would have been submerged if the level had further gone up by even 3 meters,” said a director at THDC. Haridwar too would have witnessed largescale devastation.
At Devprayag, the river level was 458.25 m at 11 am on June 16. The next day around the same time, it had risen to 469.10 m. It would have been a catastrophe downstream of Devprayag, in Rishikesh and Haridwar, if instead of 14,000 cusecs, 2,44,000 cusecs was added from Bhagirathi .
|
| All external links in the new text (all_links) | http://ejqhrzgtgdrw.com/
http://skornlzaeohz.com/
http://tkyyxhhnmity.com/
http://ezmuapkjwgpp.com/
|
| Links in the page, before the edit (old_links) | http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/06/27&PageLabel=12&EntityId=Ar01200&ViewMode=HTML
|
| All external links added in the edit (added_links) | http://ejqhrzgtgdrw.com/
http://skornlzaeohz.com/
http://tkyyxhhnmity.com/
http://ezmuapkjwgpp.com/
|
| All external links removed in the edit (removed_links) | http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/06/27&PageLabel=12&EntityId=Ar01200&ViewMode=HTML
|
| Parsed HTML source of the new revision (new_html) | <table class="wikitable">
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:100%">
<p>This is a collection of newspaper articles selected for the excellence of their content.<br />You can help by converting it into an encyclopaedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br />Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br />and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br />
</p>
See <a href="/ind/index.php/Examples" title="Examples">examples</a> and a tutorial.</div>
</td></tr></table>
<p>VDdkBL <a href="<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://ejqhrzgtgdrw.com/">http://ejqhrzgtgdrw.com/</a>">ejqhrzgtgdrw</a>, [url=<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://skornlzaeohz.com/">http://skornlzaeohz.com/</a>]skornlzaeohz[/url], [link=<a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://tkyyxhhnmity.com/">http://tkyyxhhnmity.com/</a>]tkyyxhhnmity[/link], <a rel="nofollow" class="external free" href="http://ezmuapkjwgpp.com/">http://ezmuapkjwgpp.com/</a>
</p> |
| New page text, stripped of any markup (new_text) |
This is a collection of newspaper articles selected for the excellence of their content.You can help by converting it into an encyclopaedia-style entry,deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.
See examples and a tutorial.
VDdkBL <a href="http://ejqhrzgtgdrw.com/">ejqhrzgtgdrw</a>, [url=http://skornlzaeohz.com/]skornlzaeohz[/url], [link=http://tkyyxhhnmity.com/]tkyyxhhnmity[/link], http://ezmuapkjwgpp.com/
|
| old_html | <table class="wikitable">
<tr>
<td colspan="0"><div style="font-size:100%">
<p>This is a collection of newspaper articles selected for the excellence of their content.<br />You can help by converting it into an encyclopaedia-style entry,<br />deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.<br />Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,<br />and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.<br />
</p>
See <a href="/ind/index.php/Examples" title="Examples">examples</a> and a tutorial.</div>
</td></tr></table>
<h2><span class="editsection">[<a href="/ind/index.php?title=Tehri_dam&action=edit&section=1" title="Edit section: 2013: How Tehri held [the] raging Ganga & saved lives">edit</a>]</span> <span class="mw-headline" id="2013:_How_Tehri_held_.5Bthe.5D_raging_Ganga_.26_saved_lives">2013: How Tehri held [the] raging Ganga & saved lives</span></h2>
<p>Pradeep Thakur TNN 2013/06/27
</p><p><a rel="nofollow" class="external text" href="http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=CAP/2013/06/27&PageLabel=12&EntityId=Ar01200&ViewMode=HTML">The Times of India</a>
</p><p><br />
New Delhi: The water levels in the Tehri dam were low at the start of the monsoon in June 2013. This proved a critical factor in the dam retaining waters of an engorged Bhagirathi and preventing a 10-12 feet rise in the Ganga at Rishikesh that could have been ruinous for the town and its ashrams.
</p><p>A report said the fury of nature in Uttarakhand was such that waters rose as high as a four-storeyed building at Devprayag, where the Alaknanda and Bhagirathi meet, in a 24-hour period after the June 16-17 cloudburst. The rise at Devprayag, Rishikesh and Haridwar could have been much higher but for the Tehri dam.
</p><p>On the morning of June 16, the discharge of water in Bhagirathi was 18,600 cusecs at the Tehri site. By evening, it went up to 1,05,000 cusecs and next morning touched 2,44,000 cusecs. This led to a phenomenal rise in the river level at Devprayag by 11 meters. By then, the inflow from Alaknanda was already 2,45,000 cusecs.
</p><p>This rise was unprecedented and could have resulted in total destruction of Rishikesh town and much of Haridwar if the flow of Bhagirathi was not contained by the Tehri reservoir, said officials of the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (THDC), who made the first assessment of the flash floods.
</p><p>As it was the start of the monsoon and the reservoir was relatively empty, authorities retained 95% of Bhagirathi’s fury and maintained a release of only 14,000 cusecs instead of 2,44,000 cusecs and prevented a rise in water level by at least 5 meters (more than 16 feet) in Devprayag and 10-12 feet at Rishikesh, about 60 km away as the river flows.
</p><p>“All ashrams along the Ganga in Rishikesh would have been washed away and Ram Jhula would have been submerged if the level had further gone up by even 3 meters,” said a director at THDC. Haridwar too would have witnessed largescale devastation.
</p><p>At Devprayag, the river level was 458.25 m at 11 am on June 16. The next day around the same time, it had risen to 469.10 m. It would have been a catastrophe downstream of Devprayag, in Rishikesh and Haridwar, if instead of 14,000 cusecs, 2,44,000 cusecs was added from Bhagirathi .
</p> |
| old_text |
This is a collection of newspaper articles selected for the excellence of their content.You can help by converting it into an encyclopaedia-style entry,deleting portions of the kind normally not used in encyclopaedia entries.Please also put categories, paragraph indents, headings and sub-headings,and combine this with other articles on exactly the same subject.
See examples and a tutorial.
[edit] 2013: How Tehri held [the] raging Ganga & saved lives
Pradeep Thakur TNN 2013/06/27
The Times of India
New Delhi: The water levels in the Tehri dam were low at the start of the monsoon in June 2013. This proved a critical factor in the dam retaining waters of an engorged Bhagirathi and preventing a 10-12 feet rise in the Ganga at Rishikesh that could have been ruinous for the town and its ashrams.
A report said the fury of nature in Uttarakhand was such that waters rose as high as a four-storeyed building at Devprayag, where the Alaknanda and Bhagirathi meet, in a 24-hour period after the June 16-17 cloudburst. The rise at Devprayag, Rishikesh and Haridwar could have been much higher but for the Tehri dam.
On the morning of June 16, the discharge of water in Bhagirathi was 18,600 cusecs at the Tehri site. By evening, it went up to 1,05,000 cusecs and next morning touched 2,44,000 cusecs. This led to a phenomenal rise in the river level at Devprayag by 11 meters. By then, the inflow from Alaknanda was already 2,45,000 cusecs.
This rise was unprecedented and could have resulted in total destruction of Rishikesh town and much of Haridwar if the flow of Bhagirathi was not contained by the Tehri reservoir, said officials of the Tehri Hydro Development Corporation (THDC), who made the first assessment of the flash floods.
As it was the start of the monsoon and the reservoir was relatively empty, authorities retained 95% of Bhagirathi’s fury and maintained a release of only 14,000 cusecs instead of 2,44,000 cusecs and prevented a rise in water level by at least 5 meters (more than 16 feet) in Devprayag and 10-12 feet at Rishikesh, about 60 km away as the river flows.
“All ashrams along the Ganga in Rishikesh would have been washed away and Ram Jhula would have been submerged if the level had further gone up by even 3 meters,” said a director at THDC. Haridwar too would have witnessed largescale devastation.
At Devprayag, the river level was 458.25 m at 11 am on June 16. The next day around the same time, it had risen to 469.10 m. It would have been a catastrophe downstream of Devprayag, in Rishikesh and Haridwar, if instead of 14,000 cusecs, 2,44,000 cusecs was added from Bhagirathi .
|
| Unix timestamp of change (timestamp) | 1374173232 |
